The EPA under Lisa Jackson’s orders, the same person who banned bear hunting in New Jersey is at it again. She is trying to make an anti hunting and anti firearm USA.
You can own guns but not lead ammo!
So how do you use a gun without ammo? You can’t! It’s bull because people who cannot afford the meat in town because the store prices are way too high. Because the Democrats mostly Obama is screwing up our economy and making everything more expensive.
Obama and his gang are now trying to take away our legal rights to bear arms. So I guess he is kind of like Santa but the opposite of Santa Clause. He is the Santa Claus that goes around and takes your gifts from you.
Lots of the Democrats when they heard about Obama’s EPA trying to do this were furious and that makes me think that their Messiah the great savior really isn’t the Savior. It makes me think that he and the democrats are screwing us over.
Yes, there are some disadvantages to lead. Some people say there can be lead poisoning of some animals by them eating animals that have been shot. Some people say this is just bull.
There are also advantages to lead like it is cheap and easy to get. If you ban lead hunters will be spending more money. The people that mine the lead will lose there jobs because not as much lead is needed and this makes the economy worse.
The bullet company will be making less bullets and making less money so they need less workers so this is bad, bad, bad.
So all of these people are going out of work and there are less tax payers with more unemployment so banning lead is a chain reaction will to lead, less workers and less taxes.
Now since there is no longer the traditional ammo another problem is steel bullets. Steel bullets can go right through an animal and the animal runs off and dies in the woods. This could cause more animals to get shot.
Great points Seth. I agree totally. the lead bullet ban is bad for jobs, bad for hunters, and bad for the freedom. The worse effect of this though is for personal protection. This regulation would cost lives. If you do not have lead bullets for a person carrying a handgun in a defense situation you will either have an all-copper bullet or a copper jacket bullet covering a tin/zync alloy. The tin/zync alloy is great rifle cartridge if you are shooting coyotes or rock chucks at a long range, but it would be a disaster for a defense situation. In a lethal situation with a handgun 70% of these situation are within seven feet and 90% are under 15 feet. A all copper bullet will go right through a bad guy without expanding and the lower velocities of a handgun on the copper-jacketed tin/zync alloy will not penetrate enough. I know the lefties will be saying that the military will be going to this alloy, but the military is using .223 Rem which is a small, high velocity round. The parameters are different at home. At seven feet there is no margin for error. Personally I carry a H & K .45 ACP sull-size with 230 grain Federal Hydra-Shok Jacket Hollow Points. This lead ban is bad for everyone.
The great news is that the EPA has dropped the idea for the lead bullet ban.
Thanks for visiting the site and the reply. Thank god they are dropping the idea. Keep leaving comments you make good points.
Fisherman are not safe though. The EPA is still reviewing whether or not to ban lead fishering sinkers.
I read that a different type of sinker can cost 20 times as much as lead. Where i live we have a lot of poor people that need to fish to eat and that is sure going to hurt them.